Spring is here now, but the Concentrate on Energy Renewable Energy Incentives aren’t! Wisconsin used to provide incentives, as aimed by state law, to people, organizations, and businesses that installing alternative energy systems – solar, wind, biodigesters, and more – through Focus on Energy, that your public Service Commission oversees.

Last June 2011, Concentrate on Energy announced a “limited suspension” of incentive obligations to businesses that are looking to install a renewable system. Since the first of this year, Concentrate on Energy stopped offering renewable bonuses to homeowners as well! Bonuses would be offered in the spring again, said Shaw Environmental, the state-contracted administrator. Today Spring begins, and Focus on Energy still needs to restart the incentives program.

Tell the public Service Commission to RESTART the incentives: – Put a comment in the PSC’s standard proceeding (5-GF-191) for Focus on Energy. Click here to get to the comment form. Contact your Wisconsin legislators. The Concentrate on Energy program used to truly have a successful green energy motivation program, but now this program has been completely fallen. Homeowners and businesses that want to enhance the environment, support local jobs, and promote energy self-reliance need the services and bonuses to make installations affordable and easy to apply. Today Join or donate!

We urge one to reject any proposal that U.S. … Whether you call them “front doors” or “back again doors,” presenting intentional vulnerabilities into secure products for the government’s use can make those products less secure against other attackers. Every computer security expert that has spoken publicly with this concern agrees on this point, including the government’s own experts. Verizon makes two stars in this season’s THAT HAS Your report Back. That is Verizon’s fifth year in the report, and they have adopted some of the best practices we’ve identified within this report. We appreciate the steps Verizon has taken up to stand by its users, but there is certainly room for improvement.

Verizon should have a stronger policy of informing users of authorities demands, disclose its data retention policies, and have a open public position opposing back doors. “Stored content” refers to marketing communications or other data that our users create and store through our services, such as text messages, photographs, or email. A warrant is required by us before disclosing stored content to law enforcement, absent an emergency involving the danger of death or serious physical injury.

  • Do you understand about the food safety
  • Encouraging employers to have basic safety committees that would initially address complaints
  • By definition, which kind of business has stockholders
  • Design experience with Rest API and relational data source design
  • Create any custom color credit card or pick your own image

Non-content identifies records we create such as customer information a customer provides at that time she signs-up for our services, and transactional information about the customer’s use of our services, such as phone numbers a customer called. Verizon publishes a mixed transparency legislation and survey enforcement guide. Inform users about government data demands. Verizon will not promise to provide advance notice to users about authorities’ data demands. Disclose data retention guidelines.

Verizon does not post information about its data retention procedures, including retention of IP addresses and erased content. Disclose content removal requests. Verizon discloses the amount of times governments seek removing user content or accounts and how usually the company complies, including formal legal process as well as informal government requests. Pro-user public policy: oppose backdoors.